Church Militant’s source said, “Principals throughout the diocese do not support the diocesan plan. The bishop called his staff to a meeting two weeks after the news broke to chastise them for their poor handling of the matter.” The source added, “The only person left defending this policy is the bishop himself. Everyone who was involved in its development has sought to distance themselves from it.”
The National Catholic Reporter published this article on the Diocese of Jefferson City LGBT/transgender process, an article which no one from either side seems to like except Sr. Elizabeth Youngs. She is only unhappy that parents and lay Catholics found out about it: “Among the worriers are several blogs and websites, which Superintendent of Catholic Schools Sr. Elizabeth Youngs, a member of the Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth, says started posting a “hijacked” copy of the document, which was meant as internal guidance for pastors and principals only.” And they would have gotten away with it too if Scooby Doo and his friends hadn’t uncovered their plot. Ruh Roh Shaggy, when the Diocese has it’s annual capital campaign this fall you would be excused for thinking the were selling you shares in the South Sea Trading Company, ““For carrying-on an undertaking of great advantage but no-one to know what it is!!” Hijacking is stealing airplanes or ships and making them take a different course, which means that she is implying that information was stolen from her and that it is stealing to inform people of what the Chancery says and does. Dialogue is theft if it contains meaning they wish to conceal. Good is bad and bad is good you know. These people are so arrogant and clerical that they really think they have unlimited authority over your children, that the clergy is the Church, and that it belongs to them to do with as they wish. Folks, the Church is the body of Christ, all baptized believers, and these people exceed the authority delegated to them by the Jesus they claim to serve because Church moral law applies to them as much as anyone else.
Dear Sister Elizabeth, please have the courtesy to inform parents before upending 2000 years of Catholic morality in education, please dialogue with parents. “Those at the chancery claim that in the spirit of Pope Francis they are enlisting a spirit of dialogue and accompaniment,” Presberg said. “Well, there was no dialogue for the parents who have kids in the school already; and a lot of them feel extremely unaccompanied.”
In the spirit of the great South Sea Bubble we wish to point out, again, this recycled bit of very bad math: “Hundreds of opponents attend monthly vigils near the cathedral, and the diocese has received dozens of concerned letters and phone calls.” So you are telling us that hundreds of people drive from all over the Diocese to attend a rosary vigil and yet only dozens have written or called?
The math of Church attendance is even more, well, bad. It’s powerful weak. But wait, they simply wish to evangelize at all costs! At the cost of annihilation. Fr. Joe Corel Weighs in: “However, Corel said, “It would almost be inconsistent to say you cannot enroll these children no matter what. If the purpose and nature of a Catholic school is to evangelize and reach out, then our stance when we visit with someone is ‘How do we bring you in?'” Besides the very questionable idea of letting the clergy in this Diocese make decisions about homosexuality and children, Fr. Joe Corel and Bishop Gaydos haven’t brought anyone IN but they’ve helped a lot of people come OUT. They have overseen the Diocese as nearly 60% of the Catholic population left the Church along with almost the entirety of the cohort under age 30. If you are older than 30 look around at the empty pews and recall how many people attended mass in rural parishes up into the 1980’s. Do you remember standing room only Masses at urban parishes up until around 2002? If senior citizens now outnumber children in your parish then the decline will accelerate. Two things you will rarely see at Mass in this Diocese are teenagers and anyone in their 20’s. That’s not a natural human population, it’s rather the opposite of the normal population pyramid. Young people apparently find this Diocesan Church and the clercy unattractive. They might try to argue that the decline is the result of the decline of the rural population in the last few decades but this cannot be the cause. Examine the urban parishes in the two largest cities in the Diocese, Columbia and Jefferson City. Keep in mind that this isn’t the rural South, there was a dominant Catholic population in Cole and Osage counties and a strong Catholic population throughout the Diocese, look at the Census map. One of the bright red Catholic counties in the middle of the state is Cole County, home to Jefferson City and the Cathedral. The Population of Columbia grew from 36,650 in 1960 to 120,612 currently. Jefferson City grew from 28,228 in 1960 to 43,013 currently. Columbia tripled in size and Jefferson City grew by 50% (Boone County grew 220% while Cole County, home to Jefferson City, grew by 88%, Columbia annexed more land than the City of Jefferson which makes Columbia appear to grow much faster comparatively.) Yet currently there are the same number of parishes as there were in 1960. A healthy Church would have at least 50% more parishes and maybe even double the number. Instead Mass attendance since the 90’s is down 40-50% and two Jefferson City parishes recently reduced the number of Sunday Mass times. In one sense only are they evangelizing people to new parishes: they are growing “parishes” with names like Concord Baptist Church and The Crossing. They’ve grown large partly by absorbing fallen away Catholics. If you interview those people you will often find devout people who were scandalized by abuse, ignored, or who were thirsty for truth even if it was only part of the truth. Watching the obstinacy and intrigue of the Chancery should give a reader of this blog some empathy for those believers. A word to those churches though, we have very few faithful for you to poach anymore, you are on your own in this anti-Christian culture. Good luck to you all and to the leaders of the Diocese.
Now, knowing all of that, you can begin to understand what a betrayal it is for Bishop Gaydos, John DeLaPorte, Fr. Joe Corel, Sister Elizabeth, and Sister Julie to stand on their failure and open the Church and Catholic Schools up to a process that has been a disaster for other churches. Membership at mainline Protestant Churches has declined precipitously, see here, and here. These are Churches that ordain openly gay ministers and embrace the physical acts that have come to define the Gay lifestyle. Wherever you stand on the debate about the sinfulness of those acts the indisputable fact is that most people don’t commit those acts and most Christians aren’t interested in attending a Church that considers them good. A Christian Church that embraces homosexual acts is like a mirage in the desert, once one reaches it it ceases to exist. It’s sterility self erases. At the head of this Process stands Bishop John Gaydos, what does he think about the annihilation of the Catholic Church?
At at least one Jefferson City parish one can’t blame the sudden decline in donations on either the Chancery staff or the campaign run by this blog, it was just Deacon Tony Valdes as far as anyone knows: http://www.newstribune.com/news/local/story/2017/aug/18/suspended-deacon-charged-with-felony-stealing/686915/
However, just as with the revolutionary LGBT/Transgender process, politics has crept it’s way into the Church. If the clergy would stick to preaching the Gospel then we would stick to quoting scripture and the Catholic Catechism. For many people it seems that political party trumps Church office and duty. A few years back there was a contested race in Jefferson City between two Catholics for the presiding circuit court judge for Division 4 of the 19th Judicial Circuit Court in Missouri. ((This is the court where Valdes’ felony case should be heard.) No comment here on either candidate, both are assumed to be practicing Catholics as far as we know. We focus on Deacon Tony Valdes who dipped his toes in politics while a Deacon by being a very public supporter of the person who became judge, namely Pat Joyce. Her husband happens to be Diocesan spokesman Deacon Dan Joyce. We know this thanks to the magic of Facebook, where often the people who have nothing important to say do the most talking. What you will hopefully see coming up is proper procedure where a judge with a connection to the accused recuses herself and there are no favors requested of other judges so that there is a fair hearing. That way any solid evidence would lead to a felony conviction. Back to the point, please put the Gospel first because delving into politics and finance hasn’t ended well for our clergy.
Now embezzlement is more prevalent than one would assume, here are the top 10 most notorious local embezzlers according to the Columbia Business Times. The problem Deacon Valdes may have had was not being too big (or too not-for-profit) to have his crime covered up. They call this Too Big To Fail in the Finance industry. Religious and not-for-profit entities seem to get a pass when it comes to audits but they shouldn’t because they are staffed by the same human beings with the same fallen nature as any oridnary company. If you saw your Diocesan leaders going to confession weekly then you might assume they were improving themselves but one look at confession times and the confession line should tell you that humility and repentance isn’t likely their jam.
In conclusion we believe that when funding suddenly declines at a not for profit entity, when staff are fired and not replaced, when politics enters the scene as it has at the Chancery, then it’s probably time for an independent audit. That sounds harsh but so did the priestly abuse accusations until some dogged reporters finally listened to the whitstleblowers and investigated. It’s time to quit sneaking around playing politics and finally clear the air once and for all. With an AUDIT.
This is why it matters what the official position of the Diocese is and why they need to issue an official policy in line with Church teaching to stop the process before it causes more trouble for parishes.
A couple of quick points:
If you in any way feel that the parents concerned about this radical Diocesan process need to simply dialogue with Bishop Gaydos to make things better then please understand that many people have tried to do just that with no success. Many more have tried to dialogue with his staff, who wrote the process, and some of those people have succeeded. The response is always the same, they repeat the talking points and dissembling language. Therefor, if you feel dialogue is the answer, we invite you to attempt it and see how reasonable the response is and how well they acknowledge your concerns. Good luck to you, you are dealing with a mix of pride and raw power.
In various letters and emails the creators of this process have sought to assure concerned parents that it is not a policy and yet at the same time that they would never permit a boy identifying as a girl to use the girls bathroom. The language is clouded by mixing the words gender and sex so that one can’t even be sure they are affirming anything or understand exactly what they are saying. Nevertheless such a statement implies a policy about bathroom use which makes us really curious as to why this hasn’t been stated publicly and clearly via the Diocesan media channels. That’s not to say that they have publicly or clearly stated anything else about this process either.
Parents should demand that this radical process be halted and clarified with a clear Diocesan policy before the Bishop uses distraction and dissembling language long enough to get the camels nose under the tent. But, if having Catholic Schools that are identical to public schools is what you wish, then enjoy the process because it won’t take long and you won’t notice the pain until it’s too late.